Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Among 3 ICLR submissions, this reviewer felt only 1 was written 100% by humans.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/27/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/10/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe author states that this post is 100% human-written, and appended "evidence" at the end to deal with being misjudged as AI-generated.62% similarUnverifiedA researcher who reviews for both ICLR and AAMAS posted on Reddit, saying that the eight submissions they handled were outrageously poor in quality and advising authors not to submit if they are not ready.56% similarUnverifiedThe writer assessed the AI-generated novel manuscript as having characters with no growth arc, a nearly stagnant plot, 90% atmosphere-building, 5% police-and-crime tropes, and 5% repetitive description.54% similarUnverifiedCognition claims that 89% of the code submitted by its engineers is written by Devin.53% similarUnverifiedAn ICLR reviewer posted on Reddit that they encountered a large amount of incomprehensible AI-generated text during review, which resonated widely.53% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1105174API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1105174MCP
get_claim(id=1105174)