Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On a benchmark of 23 test scenarios and two tools, the strategy of "intercept on any change to the full set" had a false positive rate of 50%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/29/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/27/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn single-environment tests with 25 benign tasks and three frameworks, the probabilistic gate reduced completion rate to 56%, hard-blocked 4% of legitimate calls, and diverted 12–16% of legitimate calls into a delay queue, while no gate, the rule gate, and the LLM review gate all had completion rates of 68–72%.77% similarUnverifiedIn the ablation experiment, replacing the gate with the naïve check commonly used in unconstrained systems (fewer visible errors in recent trajectories), the same loop admitted 309 harmful changes and left the miss rate above 10% in 49 out of 90 runs.75% similarUnverifiedIn the benchmark's 60 runs, the early termination conditions were triggered 27 times, including 21 detections of lack of progress and 6 cases of model provider unavailability.75% similarUnverifiedWhen testing LLM citation behavior, the same prompt should be run at least 20–50 times, ideally expanded to more than 100 times.74% similarUnverified2024 年的多项基准测试表明，经过严格安全对齐的模型在代码生成任务上的拒绝率比基座模型高出 15-30%，在创意写作任务上的自我审查率高达 40%73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1112316API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1112316MCP
get_claim(id=1112316)