Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In the 45-session prototype study, 23.4% (95% CI 17.1–35.7) of code-editing segments received no independent check after the final edit.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedWhen small models are made to do verbatim quotations, only 24% to 35% of the quotations pass verification against the source text.71% similarUnverifiedA developer reviewed 27 prompts accumulated over one year, of which 22 failed the reproducibility test (i.e., others using the prompts could not obtain the same output as the author).69% similarUnverifiedAfter implementing a process of downloading sources first and then letting the model write, 36 of 39 research citations were verbatim correct, and 95% of quotations in thinker biographies passed source verification.68% similarUnverifiedIn the study, AI handled only 23.3% of review comments, and the vast majority of inspection work was still done by humans.67% similarUnverifiedA study published in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering in 2019 showed that code reviews assisted by good visualization had a defect detection rate approximately 25% higher than plain-text reviews, with review time reduced by approximately 30%.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1113997API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1113997MCP
get_claim(id=1113997)