Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
The researchers tested 17 models on 3DCodeEdit, and the average success rate was only 37%.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/28/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn a test simulating real Cursor coding, the score improved from 34.1% to 55.5%.67% similarUnverifiedIn code repair tasks, the success rate using a static validator was 26.3%, rising to 29.2% after introducing predictive selection, and reaching 31.2% after world model adaptation66% similarUnverifiedIn a rigorous trial, experienced developers using AI tools on their own mature codebase were 19% slower, yet they themselves believed they were 20% faster.65% similarUnverifiedIn multiple benchmarks, even the most advanced models can have hallucination rates of 15%–30% in specialized technical domains.65% similarUnverifiedThe original video cited a benchmark test: the model failed to complete a task when given 46 tools, yet passed the same task once the tools were reduced to 19.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114760API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114760MCP
get_claim(id=1114760)