Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the Artificial Analysis coding agent leaderboard, Large 4 scores 48%, essentially tied with the top open-source model GLM5.3, but uses 47% fewer tokens per task on average.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
10/30/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 11/13/2026
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn public health benchmarks, an ordinary AI model scored higher than Tabibu in the developer's own re-run, 0.522 versus 0.426 (non-official leaderboard data), and the developer believes the reason is that Tabibu's safety layer lowered its score in the benchmark.71% similarUnverifiedFor comparison, the Program-of-Thought baseline achieves 72.0% overall accuracy and the tool-calling agent achieves 58.7%.70% similarUnverifiedTaking each model's best effort tier, the solve rate for 5x5 grids is approximately 85%, dropping to 46% for 10x10, and only 20% remaining for 15x15.69% similarUnverifiedAcross all 68 task-paradigm combinations, in 35.3% of them PPG foundation models show no meaningful advantage over the random/constant baseline.69% similarUnverifiedThe Neural 3 base model's 4-layer version scores only 11.7 on the mobile action benchmark and 21 on droid call, while the full 20-layer version scores 86 and 47 respectively, and one developer's self-test yielded only 32.2%.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1114953API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1114953MCP
get_claim(id=1114953)