Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
Human intuition still matters in troubleshooting: after the AI concluded "it's not the toilet," the blogger insisted on asking "then what exactly is it," ultimately tracing the clue to the switch links and physical vibration; the agents are responsible for broadening the search, and the human is responsible for proposing the key hypothesis.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Flush the Toilet and the Internet Drops? Using AI Agents to Find the Culprit
youtubeNetworkChuck10/17/2026
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedAny task with a verifiable result—where you may not know how to do it but can judge whether the answer is correct—can essentially be solved by AI.77% similarUnverifiedPlatt believes AI is not a replacement for human scientists, but a tool that amplifies human creativity, and that the hardest parts of scientific discovery to automate are problem formulation, intuitive judgment, and the weighing of research value.75% similarVerifiedTrue scientific discovery typically requires extrapolation ability—jumping beyond the known data distribution to propose unprecedented hypotheses—which is currently a weakness of AI.74% similarUnverifiedThe discovery of high-value vulnerabilities (such as logic vulnerabilities, privilege bypasses, and business process flaws) still requires a deep human understanding of business logic that AI cannot replace.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1122269API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1122269MCP
get_claim(id=1122269)