Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
A well-designed coding agent asks before running dangerous commands, works within restricted folders, and displays every change as a reviewable diff, and humans should retain the final say.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEffective human oversight usually includes: requiring the model to explain key logic, reviewing code involving data and authentication line by line, using automated tests and static scanning as a fallback, and keeping commits small and clear in version control.76% similarVerifiedIf the results of automated checking tools are linked to acceptance decisions, a robust appeals and manual review mechanism must be established.75% similarUnverifiedRequiring agents to output an architectural draft for human review before generating large amounts of code can intercept directional errors at an early stage.75% similarUnverifiedIn automated prompt optimization scenarios, fully delegating judgment to the system carries a risk of goal drift, since prompt quality is inherently subjective and task-dependent.74% similarUnverified智能体应以仅建议模式上线，先让智能体准备草稿而员工照旧跑现有流程，对比结果并记录审核者编辑或拒绝草稿的原因73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1123206API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1123206MCP
get_claim(id=1123206)