Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On 120 template-related requests, the full workflow achieved 98.3% first-round specification and decision accuracy, versus 92.5% for pattern-assisted single attempts and 82.5% for the model-only approach.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 1/31/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn tasks with propositional constraints, the proportion of models integrating candidates already verified as invalid is as high as 93%–100%.74% similarUnverifiedRanked by question difficulty, persistence rate was 91.4% on the 60 questions that all models answered correctly, but only 73.5% on the 52 questions that at least one model got wrong, indicating that sycophancy tracks uncertainty.74% similarUnverifiedOn math tasks, the accuracy was 79% when the model wrote out reasoning steps, and only 11% when it gave a bare number.73% similarUnverifiedDuring testing, cases emerged where a model claimed 95% confidence in a move but scored 0 points according to the evaluation criteria.72% similarUnverifiedOn a test subset of 152 completely untouched questions, anchored hybrid retrieval achieved 42.11%, while the planner-guided method reached only 36.84%.71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1125176API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1125176MCP
get_claim(id=1125176)