Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
When building three canvas physics demos, the model used approximately 62,000 tokens at a cost of about $3, while GLM 5.2 used 36,000 tokens at a cost of only 8 cents.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/6/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/4/2026(expired)
Sources
AI Weekly: Top Coding Model Returns, Google's New Flash Checkpoint, and the Video Generation Race
bilibili安得广厦千万间6787/3/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn the Atomic Chat comparative evaluation, HY3 consumed approximately 30,000 tokens to build three HTML5 Canvas physics demos at a cost of only fractions of a cent, while Gemini 3.5 Flash cost approximately $0.21 and GLM 5.2 cost $0.07.79% similarUnverifiedIn the 3D art museum test, Opus 4.8 output 437,000 tokens and Fable 5 output 280,000 tokens, with Fable 5 costing approximately $64, which is about 37% more expensive than Opus 4.8's approximately $46.71% similarUnverifiedBased on mainstream model API pricing as a reference, the cost of generating a 10-page PPT may be between 0.5 and 2 Chinese yuan, with AI-generated images adding an extra 0.2–0.5 yuan per image.68% similarUnverifiedIn the Exploit Bench test, Sol consumes approximately $120,000 to $130,000 in token costs, while Mythos Preview reaches as high as $350,000.66% similarUnverified传统角膜地形图仪造价高达2万美元，而SmartKC将设备成本压缩到20美元65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/112732API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/112732MCP
get_claim(id=112732)