Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
An audit of 60 cases confirmed that 57 of them contain substantive tool selection or information flow errors.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe team audited the formulas in the benchmark against current clinical guidelines one by one, flagging 16 entries among the 55 calculators that had issues with versioning, intended use, or coefficients.71% similarUnverifiedThe study evaluates on the MedCalc-Bench Verified benchmark, which contains 1,100 cases covering 55 calculators.68% similarUnverifiedAn evaluation study constructed a clinical case library comprising 349 de-identified outpatient records from 62 hospitals and selected 60 representative cases as the evaluation set.67% similarUnverifiedThe author published an audit report on 120 agent output samples as the empirical basis for the precision-first strategy.64% similarUnverifiedThis test is an early sample of about 60 people, the scoring system was designed by a startup, and the methodological details have not been fully disclosed; the conclusions should be treated as directional reference rather than definitive.63% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1129289API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1129289MCP
get_claim(id=1129289)