Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On 215 instances from five benchmark sets, compared with the best performance among SMAC3, RBFOpt and random search, LDST reduced the geometric mean loss by 43.9% on easy instances and 16.7% on medium instances.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedIn high-dimensional medical data, assigning higher class weights to minority classes or using adaptive loss functions such as Focal Loss is generally more robust than SMOTE oversampling.70% similarUnverifiedAnthropic's experiments showed that combining embedding with BM25 and adding context to chunks reduced the top-20 retrieval failure rate by 49% (from 5.7% to 2.9%).69% similarUnverifiedAnthropic's experiments showed that adding a reranker on top of contextual retrieval brought the reduction in top-20 retrieval failure rate to 67% (from 5.7% to 1.9%).69% similarUnverifiedExperimental results show that CARE reduces the number of human queries by 25% to 81% compared to various baseline methods68% similarUnverifiedOn four models and three benchmarks, the best-performing skeleton specification reduced average test error by 48.4% compared with the best end-to-end behavioral specification.68% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1129447API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1129447MCP
get_claim(id=1129447)