Unverified50% confidenceDecision RuleExact time
According to the standards of the Avatar Intelligence paradigm, the key metric for judging whether an agent product is good is not the task completion rate, but how much oversight effort the user needs to invest to complete the same task.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
11/3/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedEvaluating whether an Agent is useful should measure the cost of the entire task (preparation, generating results and review); if the effort of correcting and rechecking exceeds doing it yourself, automation has not produced actual savings.79% similarUnverifiedWhen evaluating agentic coding tools, one cannot use the local metrics for measuring completion tools; instead one needs to observe higher-level signals such as task-level success rates, rework rates and the degree of human intervention.76% similarUnverifiedWhen an Agent determines that tools are no longer needed, it is essentially judging that the existing information is sufficient to complete the task; if the output at this point is unsatisfactory, it can be resolved by switching to a more capable model.76% similarUnverifiedThe difficulty of evaluating agents lies in the fact that their behavior is sequential and their paths are not unique, requiring comprehensive scoring across dimensions such as task completion rate, action correctness, step efficiency, and safety, often measured using trajectory evaluation and end-to-end task success rate.76% similarUnverifiedThe industry commonly measures agent capability by task success rate rather than single-demo performance: repeat the same task many times and see how many times it can deliver a qualified result in one pass, and whether it can self-detect and correct when it fails.76% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1130736API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1130736MCP
get_claim(id=1130736)