Unverified50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
In a retrospective evaluation covering three deployment cycles and a total of 1,122 recorded coaching dialogues, conditional strategy packages raised the correctness rate from 57.9% to 82.0% (compared with atomic facts).
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
11/4/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 2/2/2027
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOn 120 template-related requests, the full workflow achieved 98.3% first-round specification and decision accuracy, versus 92.5% for pattern-assisted single attempts and 82.5% for the model-only approach.69% similarUnverifiedIn the strictly comparable experiment with fifteen players and three impostors in the sixth league, the trained network's crew win rate over 300 rounds was 93.3%, while gpt-oss under the dialogue+intuition format won 16 of 20 rounds (80%), with a one-sided Fisher exact test p = 0.052.67% similarUnverifiedIn the benchmark test, the heuristic peak rule achieved 93.3% overall accuracy, 100.0% impact recall, and 38.4% cadence false positives, requiring manual threshold tuning.66% similarUnverifiedRanked by question difficulty, persistence rate was 91.4% on the 60 questions that all models answered correctly, but only 73.5% on the 52 questions that at least one model got wrong, indicating that sycophancy tracks uncertainty.65% similarUnverifiedThe final adaptation stage updates only 88.66 million parameters, and the training data consists of 8,192 curated views.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/1133813API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/1133813MCP
get_claim(id=1133813)