Expired80% confidenceFactTime unknown
In the test, Kimi K2.6 spent over 22 minutes repeatedly retrying, all of which failed, and was unable to generate runnable code.
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/29/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedKimi 5.1 was the first model to finish its code output in the first round but threw errors immediately upon execution67% similarUnverifiedIn front-end development tests, Kimi K2.6 surpassed Claude Opus 4 in certain scenarios.62% similarUnverifiedThe independent tester ran tests on Claude 4.5 Haiku more than five times repeatedly, and the results consistently showed poor performance.61% similarUnverifiedKimi K2 demonstrated faster execution speed during testing, quickly showing a Complete status.61% similarUnverifiedIn the code review test, K2.6 consumed 97.7k tokens to find 7 genuine issues and scored 9 points, while K2.7-Code consumed 83.3k tokens to find 6 genuine issues and scored 8.5 points.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13851API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13851MCP
get_claim(id=13851)