Unverified80% confidenceFactTime unknown
CLI工具相比MCP不会占用太多上下文窗口，在长对话场景中优势明显
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCLI工具在被调用时才产生上下文消耗，而MCP工具的定义从服务器连接起就持续占用空间77% similarUnverified如果某个工具有CLI等价物（如GitHub的gh命令），使用CLI比MCP更加上下文高效，因为不会添加持久性的工具定义75% similarUnverifiedThe credit-refill plugin achieves continuous conversation through script injection rather than through the MCP protocol71% similarUnverifiedCompared to the MCP approach, the script injection approach is not subject to session time limits, and the conversation window remains active even after being left unattended overnight71% similarUnverifiedMCP servers can be quickly added using CLI commands, for example by running 'codex mcp add context7' to add the Context7 server.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/13933API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/13933MCP
get_claim(id=13933)