Expired85% confidenceFactTime unknown
OmniMerge V4 scored 84.76 on the HumanEval test, on par with the Q6K original version.
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOmniMerge V4 achieved 73.4% on the MBPP code test, an improvement of 15.8 percentage points compared to the original Q6K quantization's 56.2%.71% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro scored 37.7 on the Humanity's Last Exam benchmark.67% similarUnverifiedThe OPUS 4.6 distilled version comes from the Jacker community and performed well in the Qwen 3.5 era, but the 3.6 V1 preview test results were unsatisfactory, and its Q6 precision also falls short of NVFP4.66% similarUnverifiedIn testing, GLM 5.1 achieved a composite score of 89.3, ranking first and surpassing Claude Sonnet 4.6's score of 87.2.65% similarUnverifiedOpus 5在AI Omniscience测试拿了31分，避免瞎编的能力优于Opus 4.865% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/18010API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/18010MCP
get_claim(id=18010)