Expired85% confidenceOpinionTime unknown
The tester proposed that the optimal workflow is for Sonnet to handle planning, Haiku sub-agents to execute specific operations, and Sonnet to handle final review.
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
VerifiedThe Sonnet model underlying Claude Code consistently leads on mainstream programming benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-bench.71% similarUnverifiedMatt Pocock uses the Opus model for code review and the Sonnet model for code implementation, believing that different tasks require different levels of intelligence.69% similarUnverifiedIn a real-world test, Claude Sonnet 4.5 completed the full construction of a real-time person detection application based on YOLO 11 using only a single natural language instruction, requiring no additional intervention from prompt to execution.67% similarUnverifiedThe tester used VS Code Copilot with OPAI 4.7 to design the evaluation plan, and used Sonnet 4.6 to execute the evaluation and generate the report.66% similarUnverifiedIn the Pillow library RGB-to-HSV precision bug test, Claude Code using the Sonnet 4.6 model passed on the first attempt with clear logic, earning a perfect score.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/24348API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/24348MCP
get_claim(id=24348)