Unverified85% confidenceFactTime unknown
2024年美国最高法院在Lindke v. Freed案中裁定，公职人员在特定条件下屏蔽公民可能构成违反第一修正案的行为
1
Sources
85%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Sources
Threads无法屏蔽Meta AI账号：强推AI引发用户权益争议
rss
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified最高法院在Printz v. United States（1997）案中确立了反征用原则，限制联邦政府强制调用地方执法资源66% similarUnverifiedIn the 2018 case Carpenter v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court established that the aggregation of continuous location data constitutes a substantial intrusion into personal privacy, and government access is subject to Fourth Amendment constraints.63% similarUnverifiedThe 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Van Buren v. United States narrowed the scope of applicability of the CFAA.62% similarVerifiedThe Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), passed in the United States in 2016, provided for the first time a federal civil litigation pathway for trade secret misappropriation, allowing victims to seek emergency injunctive relief from federal courts.59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/27372API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/27372MCP
get_claim(id=27372)