Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
In 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Van Buren v. United States that merely accessing information one is authorized to access but for an improper purpose does not constitute a violation of the CFAA.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Van Buren v. United States narrowed the scope of applicability of the CFAA.70% similarUnverified2024年美国最高法院在Lindke v. Freed案中裁定，公职人员在特定条件下屏蔽公民可能构成违反第一修正案的行为69% similarUnverified违反无障碍访问规范在部分司法辖区（如美国ADA法案适用范围）可能面临法律风险64% similarUnverified2011年美国最高法院在AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion案中以5比4裁定各州不得以'不公平'为由拒绝执行仲裁协议中的集体诉讼豁免条款63% similarUnverifiedIn the 2018 case Carpenter v. United States, the U.S. Supreme Court established that the aggregation of continuous location data constitutes a substantial intrusion into personal privacy, and government access is subject to Fourth Amendment constraints.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/786956API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/786956MCP
get_claim(id=786956)