Unverified75% confidenceDecision RuleTime unknown
无线震动报警器优先选择433MHz或Zigbee而非WiFi直连：WiFi机型功耗高、续航短且断网即失效，433MHz穿墙性能更适合门窗分布式布点
1
Sources
75%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified无线探测器优先选433MHz或Zigbee而非私有2.4GHz协议，433穿墙能力强适合大户型多墙体，2.4GHz易被WiFi干扰且穿透差91% similarUnverified无线传感器优先选433MHz或Zigbee协议而非纯WiFi直连，433MHz穿墙能力强、功耗低（电池可用1-2年），纯WiFi传感器每个都占路由器名额且耗电快91% similarUnverified纯WiFi协议报警器在3个以上设备同时联网时易掉线，报警类安防设备优先选ZigBee/433MHz子设备+网关方案，网关走WiFi/有线保证推送可达87% similarUnverified选择无线探测器时应确认其无线频段/协议（如433MHz、Zigbee、Z-Wave）与自家报警主机一致，且优先选支持双向通信的协议，可回传低电量和防拆状态；单向433MHz便宜但主机无法确认设备在线85% similarUnverified无线探测器优先选433MHz或Zigbee协议，Zigbee组网稳定支持双向通信可反馈电量，433MHz穿墙好但为单向通信、无法确认信号送达，大户型选Zigbee84% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/356936API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/356936MCP
get_claim(id=356936)