Unverified80% confidenceDecision RuleTime unknown
无线传感器优先选433MHz或Zigbee协议而非纯WiFi直连，433MHz穿墙能力强、功耗低（电池可用1-2年），纯WiFi传感器每个都占路由器名额且耗电快
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified无线震动报警器优先选择433MHz或Zigbee而非WiFi直连：WiFi机型功耗高、续航短且断网即失效，433MHz穿墙性能更适合门窗分布式布点91% similarUnverified无线探测器优先选433MHz或Zigbee而非私有2.4GHz协议，433穿墙能力强适合大户型多墙体，2.4GHz易被WiFi干扰且穿透差88% similarUnverified无线门窗传感器优先选支持Zigbee 3.0或Thread协议的型号，比WiFi版功耗低10倍以上，纽扣电池可用1-2年；WiFi版续航仅数月且占用路由器信道87% similarUnverified纯WiFi协议报警器在3个以上设备同时联网时易掉线，报警类安防设备优先选ZigBee/433MHz子设备+网关方案，网关走WiFi/有线保证推送可达86% similarUnverified报警套装优先选Zigbee/Z-Wave而非纯WiFi组网：WiFi子设备一般单路由承载上限约32个，且并发时易掉线，Zigbee通过网关中继可稳定支持50-128个子设备且功耗低，电池款传感器可用1-2年86% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/473341API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/473341MCP
get_claim(id=473341)