Unverified78% confidenceTradeoffTime unknown
承重墙多的老房子应优先选支持穿墙的低频段优化机型或多点Mesh，160MHz大带宽虽快但穿墙衰减严重，隔两堵墙后速率反而不如80MHz稳定
1
Sources
78%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
-
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified追求穿墙覆盖与追求峰值速率存在矛盾：160MHz超大频宽虽提升单点速率，但频段越高（5GHz/6GHz）穿墙衰减越严重，多墙老房应优先看2.4G/5G低频段增益而非纸面峰值带宽84% similarUnverified2.4GHz穿墙能力强于5GHz，穿2堵承重墙后5GHz信号衰减严重，穿墙场景应确认路由器支持频段智能切换或2.4G功率增强，而非盲目追求高频高速79% similarUnverified标称速率AX6000/AX11000的天线数量越多，穿墙能力并不必然越强——2.4GHz频段穿墙好但速率低，5GHz速率高但衰减大；穿墙需求应看2.4GHz发射功率和调制方式79% similarUnverified别墅或跨楼层住宅（门口到接收器隔2堵墙以上）应选标称距离≥300米且工作频段为433MHz的产品，433MHz比2.4GHz穿墙衰减更小76% similarUnverified三室两厅或120㎡以上、有承重墙阻隔的户型，单台大功率路由器穿墙效果不稳定，应直接上2-3只装Mesh或AP+AC方案，而非盲目追求高天线数单机75% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/358865API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/358865MCP
get_claim(id=358865)