Expired80% confidenceFactTime unknown
The Supabase team conducted comparison tests across 6 scenarios on 4 models (Claude Code/Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, GPT 5.4, GPT 5.4 Mini), and the Skill+MCP combination outperformed other conditions on every model.
1
Sources
80%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/3/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/1/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedGPT-5、Grok 4等模型在基准测试（如HumanEval、SWE-bench）上表现优异，但这些测试通常是单次代码生成，与需要多轮工具调用的真实工程任务存在显著差距77% similarUnverifiedThe four models tested in the AI coding comparison were ChatGPT 5.4, Gemini 3.1, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Kimi 5.176% similarUnverifiedThe study tested AI coding performance across models including Sonnet 4.5, GPT 5.2, GPT 5.1 Mini, and Qwen 375% similarUnverifiedIn a SaaS landing page generation test, all four models (Claude Haiku 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4.0, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-5) successfully completed the task, but Haiku 4.5 generated results the fastest.73% similarVerifiedNew-generation large language models such as GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro have achieved significantly higher scores on code capability benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-bench compared to previous versions.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/39572API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/39572MCP
get_claim(id=39572)