Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
The four models tested in the AI coding comparison were ChatGPT 5.4, Gemini 3.1, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Kimi 5.1
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
AI Coding Showdown: Four Major Models Show Shocking Performance Gaps on a Dynamic Web Scraping Task
bilibili图动中国6/11/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe five AI models tested were DeepSeek R1, Claude Sonnet 3.7, ChatGPT o3 Mini, Grok 3, and Qwen 2.5 Max.76% similarUnverifiedThe study tested AI coding performance across models including Sonnet 4.5, GPT 5.2, GPT 5.1 Mini, and Qwen 376% similarUnverifiedThe Supabase team conducted comparison tests across 6 scenarios on 4 models (Claude Code/Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, GPT 5.4, GPT 5.4 Mini), and the Skill+MCP combination outperformed other conditions on every model.76% similarVerifiedNew-generation large language models such as GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro have achieved significantly higher scores on code capability benchmarks such as HumanEval and SWE-bench compared to previous versions.74% similarUnverifiedAI aggregator platforms support access to models including GPT 5.5 Thinking, Grok 4.2, Claude 4.7, Gemini 3.1 Pro, and DeepSeek V4.73% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/48439API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/48439MCP
get_claim(id=48439)