Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On the Frontiers-WE benchmark, the gap between GLM-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 has narrowed to less than one point.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/9/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/7/2026(expired)
Sources
GLM-5.2发布：开源编程能力首次逼近闭源旗舰模型
bilibili五里墩茶社6/22/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedGLM 4.7 and Minimax M2.1 cost less than 1/25 of Claude Opus 4.5, yet achieved better results on multiple tasks.75% similarUnverifiedGLM 5.2 scored 74.4% on the Frontier SW benchmark, approaching the level of Anthropic Opus 4.8.71% similarUnverifiedOpus 4.7 showed a significant regression in long-context (500K–1M token) retrieval, far underperforming DeepSeek and GPT 5.5.71% similarUnverifiedClaude Opus 4.8放过自己代码中漏洞的概率比4.7降低了约4倍67% similarUnverifiedEarly GPT-4 had a pass rate of only 1.7% on SWE-bench, Claude 3 Opus approximately 4.8%, and it was not until mid-2024 that the 20% mark was surpassed.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/403162API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/403162MCP
get_claim(id=403162)