Unverified90% confidenceFactTime unknown
GLM 4.7和Minimax M2.1的费用不到Claude Opus 4.5的1/25，却在多个任务中取得了更好的结果
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
6/1/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 8/30/2026
Sources
前端UI生成实测：GLM 4.7、Claude Opus、Gemini、Minimax谁最强？
bilibiliGoldenSpiderAI
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified据视频对比数据，V4 Pro在智能水平上与GLM 5.2相当且价格略低75% similarUnverified在 Frontiers-WE 基准上，GLM-5.2 与 Claude Opus 4.8 的差距缩小到不足一分75% similarUnverifiedM2.7实现了GLM5级别的智能表现，且成本不到GLM5的三分之一75% similarUnverifiedGLM4的智能水平足以媲美Claude 3.5 Sonnet等主流商业闭源大模型，且使用成本更低72% similarUnverified在SaaS仪表盘测试中，GLM 4.7的Token消耗仅23,000，远低于Gemini和Claude72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/20505API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/20505MCP
get_claim(id=20505)