[KongchangAI]
Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time

多项针对NeurIPS、ACL等会议的实证研究显示提交rebuttal的论文与未提交的录用率差异在统计上并不显著

1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/11/2026
First Seen

Sources

The Pain of AI Paper Peer Review: Why Should Models Released After the Deadline Count Against You?
redditr/LanguageTechnology7/9/2026

Related Claims

Unverified作者实测发现ReAct和Reflection机制在SWE-verified基准小规模测试中带来的差异不在统计显著范围内69% similarUnverifiedACL/EMNLP评审体系中Overall分数并非其他维度分数的简单平均，而是审稿人对论文整体价值的独立综合判断61% similar

Cite This Claim

Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/484100
API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/484100
MCP
get_claim(id=484100)