Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
Grok 4.5 performs inconsistently on 3D graphics (Three.js) related tasks, with solar system rendering appearing flat and F1 racing car drift physics being inaccurate.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/11/2026
First Seen
This claim has expired. It is kept for the record and no longer describes the current state.
Valid until: 10/9/2026(expired)
Sources
Grok 4.5 Coding Benchmark: A Deep Dive into Performance, Speed, and Cost
bilibiliAI_Express7/10/2026
Related Claims
Unverified在Theo的测试中，Grok 4.6的3D游戏渲染直接黑屏失败，是他测过第一个连3D环境都渲染不出来的新模型65% similarUnverifiedThe architectural details of Grok 4.5 have not been fully disclosed, and the article speculates it may adopt a Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture.59% similarUnverifiedGrok 4.5 is from xAI and is positioned as a high-end model.57% similarUnverifiedIn fine structure testing, Pixal3D outperforms Tripl3 in restoring tail details, while the latter exhibited obvious generation failures.57% similarUnverified在Three.js可变速齿轮机械动画测试中，DeepSeek V4 Pro的效果远超此前V4 Flash版本，与Kimi K3基本持平56% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/488062API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/488062MCP
get_claim(id=488062)