Expired50% confidenceBenchmarkExact time
On frontend and visual tasks (Three.js animations, SVG graphics), GPT-5.6 models generally only scored six to seven points, while competitor Fable 5 consistently reached nine to ten points.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/11/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/9/2026(expired)
Sources
GPT-5.6三款模型深度实测：SOL/TERRA/LUNA性能与定价全解析
bilibili薛定猫AI7/9/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedGPT-5.6's clear weaknesses are concentrated in front-end visual tasks, with Sol scoring only six or seven points on projects such as Three.js and SVG, while Fable 5 can score nine or even full marks.85% similarPartially VerifiedAll three GPT-5.6 models achieved a perfect score of 10 on the long-horizon agent fine-tuning task, while GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 could only score two or three points on that task.77% similarUnverifiedThe test focus areas for GPT-5.6 Pro include SVG design, game development, 3D modeling, image reproduction, and web page generation.75% similarUnverifiedIn the pure SVG isometric projection miniature city drawing task, GPT 5.5 scored 5/10, with an acceptable number of elements but random building layout and inconsistent shadow colors.74% similarUnverifiedIn the 3D parkour game generation task, GPT 5.5 produced a blank screen in both attempts, scoring 0, while DeepSeek V4 Pro and MiniMax M3 tied with 7 points each.74% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/488172API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/488172MCP
get_claim(id=488172)