Unverified60% confidenceEventExact time
Japan's Supreme Court has ruled that AI cannot be named as a patent inventor.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Alibaba Bans Claude Code: The Battle Over AI Coding Tool Security and Data Sovereignty
bilibiliSynthMindX7/4/2026
Related Claims
VerifiedIn its AI strategy revised in 2023, Japan explicitly stated that the use of copyrighted materials during AI training does not in principle constitute infringement.66% similarUnverifiedThe UK Supreme Court rejected the request to list an AI as an inventor.64% similarUnverifiedThe European Patent Office (EPO) rejected applications related to listing an AI as an inventor.63% similarUnverifiedThe existing intellectual property legal system was designed in an era when AI did not yet possess 'creative capability'.62% similarUnverifiedThe Alice case involved patents on CLS Bank's electronic escrow transaction system, and the U.S. Supreme Court in a unanimous 9-0 ruling held that the patents were merely a computerized implementation of an abstract concept and therefore lacked patentability.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/488953API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/488953MCP
get_claim(id=488953)