Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
According to Commander Code's official internal benchmark data, DeepSeek V4 Pro outperformed Claude Opus in 6 out of 10 high-difficulty tool-dependent tasks.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Open-Source Models Keep Throwing Errors in Your Code? The Problem Might Be the Framework
bilibili小牛AI_XNAI6/11/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedAccording to Commander Code's official internal benchmark data, Kimi K2 achieved a win rate of 5 out of 10 in high-difficulty tool-dependent tasks, nearly matching Claude Opus.71% similarUnverifiedDeepSeek V4 Pro leads Qwen3.6 27B Q4 by approximately 6%, and if it had not unexpectedly underperformed on the reasoning-mathematics items, the lead could have exceeded 10%.68% similarUnverifiedBy introducing verification loops as an engineered reasoning framework, the actual intelligence performance of DeepSeek can be improved approximately 4x, at a cost of only one-seventh that of Claude Opus.68% similarUnverifiedClaude Code + DeepSeek scored 100 points in stability testing, while Codex + DeepSeek scored only 40 points.68% similarUnverifiedClaude Opus 4.8 scored 8 points in the real-world engineering project bug-fixing task, making it the highest-scoring model in that task.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/49110API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/49110MCP
get_claim(id=49110)