Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
According to Commander Code's official internal benchmark data, Kimi K2 achieved a win rate of 5 out of 10 in high-difficulty tool-dependent tasks, nearly matching Claude Opus.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Open-Source Models Keep Throwing Errors in Your Code? The Problem Might Be the Framework
bilibili小牛AI_XNAI6/11/2026
Related Claims
UnverifiedAccording to Commander Code's official internal benchmark data, DeepSeek V4 Pro outperformed Claude Opus in 6 out of 10 high-difficulty tool-dependent tasks.71% similarUnverifiedKimi K2 demonstrated faster execution speed during testing, quickly showing a Complete status.68% similarUnverifiedIn the test, Claude Opus successfully completed the task in one attempt in 7 minutes and 30 seconds, with smooth animations and complete functionality, ranking first.63% similarUnverifiedKimi K2.7 Code uses a MoE architecture with 384 experts, selecting 8 experts plus 1 shared expert per token, with actual computation approximately 2.3% of that of a dense model.62% similarUnverifiedCompared to Kimi K2.5, Kimi K2.6 has stronger API processing capabilities, runs more stably, and has a significantly improved task completion rate.62% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/49111API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/49111MCP
get_claim(id=49111)