Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
GPT-series models have far higher token utilization than competitors, with Sol typically completing equivalent tasks using only about one-third of the token count.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/12/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/10/2026(expired)
Sources
GPT-5.6 Hands-On Comparison: 20x Cheaper, But Falls Short on Creativity vs. Flagship Models
bilibili小牛AI_XNAI7/10/2026
Related Claims
Partially VerifiedAll three GPT-5.6 models achieved a perfect score of 10 on the long-horizon agent fine-tuning task, while GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 could only score two or three points on that task.77% similarUnverifiedOn difficult math problems, both SOL and TERRA achieved perfect scores of 10, and on the adaptive fine-tuning task all three GPT-5.6 models achieved perfect scores, whereas the previous GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.7 could only score two to three points on the same task.74% similarUnverifiedThe company states that Sol consumes fewer tokens than GPT-5.5 when completing similar tasks.74% similarUnverifiedGPT-5.6 Sol achieves 92.2% on the BrowseComp browsing task benchmark.73% similarUnverifiedSol 是三款模型中能力最强的，价格与 GPT-5.5 持平，适合复杂 coding 与长任务场景71% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/492232API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/492232MCP
get_claim(id=492232)