Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The article compares GPT-5.2 Codex against Anthropic's Opus 4.5 through multiple real-world test cases including frontend generation, physics simulation, 3D scene rendering, and code refactoring.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026
Sources
Related Claims
VerifiedThePrimeagen在同一天测试了Claude Opus 4.6和GPT 5.3 Codex，用完全相同的任务进行编程对决76% similarUnverifiedGPT-5 Codex的Web版本呈现了四次测试中效果最好的结果，软体物理变形效果接近原版游戏75% similarUnverifiedGPT-5 Codex在数学和物理计算方面可能更胜一筹，软体物理的变形效果更接近真实74% similarUnverifiedThe experiment tested three AI models — Claude Opus 4.6, GPT Codex, and Gemini — across three dimensions: code generation, environment interaction, and tool invocation.73% similarUnverified在多米诺骨牌物理模拟测试中，Opus 4.5使用一次提示即完成五个阵型设计，而GPT-5.2 Codex需要两次提示才达到基本可用状态72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/51099API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/51099MCP
get_claim(id=51099)