Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
The article compares GPT-5.2 Codex against Anthropic's Opus 4.5 through multiple real-world test cases including frontend generation, physics simulation, 3D scene rendering, and code refactoring.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Medium-term (~90 days)
Relevance
7/2/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
GPT-5.2 Codex vs Opus 4.5 Hands-On: A Comprehensive Comparison of Coding Ability, Speed, and Developer Experience
bilibili晟6668886/6/2026
Related Claims
VerifiedThePrimeagen tested Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT 5.3 Codex on the same day, pitting them against each other in a coding battle using identical tasks.76% similarUnverifiedGPT-5 Codex's web version delivered the best results across the four tests, with soft-body physics deformation effects close to the original game.75% similarUnverifiedGPT-5 Codex may have an edge in mathematical and physics calculations, with soft-body physics deformation effects closer to reality.74% similarUnverifiedThe experiment tested three AI models — Claude Opus 4.6, GPT Codex, and Gemini — across three dimensions: code generation, environment interaction, and tool invocation.73% similarUnverifiedIn a domino physics simulation test, Opus 4.5 completed five formation designs with a single prompt, while GPT-5.2 Codex required two prompts to reach a basically usable state.72% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/51099API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/51099MCP
get_claim(id=51099)