Verified75% confidenceFactExact time
Theorem provers such as Lean, Coq, and Isabelle require every reasoning step to be translated into strict logical notation and automatically checked for compliance.
5
Sources
75%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
VerifiedLean requires that every step of derivation be written in a strict type-theoretic language, with logical completeness automatically verified by a computational kernel.81% similarVerifiedInteractive theorem provers such as Lean, Coq, and Isabelle allow proof steps to be encoded in machine-verifiable formal languages80% similarUnverifiedEarly automated theorem provers such as formal proof assistants Coq, Lean, and Isabelle primarily rely on symbolic reasoning and exhaustive search; they excel at verifying the correctness of known proofs but lack creativity.79% similarVerifiedFormal proof systems (such as Lean, Coq, and Isabelle) require every reasoning step to conform to a predefined axiomatic system and be mechanically verified by computer78% similarUnverifiedThe Lean formal proof assistant operates on the basis of type theory and the Curry–Howard correspondence, and every proof step must be verified by the kernel's type checker77% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/521374API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/521374MCP
get_claim(id=521374)