Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
美国AI算法专利受2014年Alice Corp.诉CLS Bank案框架约束，纯粹数学方法不可专利，中国和欧洲专利局审查口径相对宽松
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
7/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe EU passed the AI Act establishing a risk-tiered regulatory framework, the United States restricts exports of high-end AI chips to China through export controls, and China has built a domestic regulatory system centered on a filing registration system.64% similarUnverifiedAI book-deconstruction imitation writing involves copyright risks; when the structure extracted by AI is highly similar to the original work, the legal boundaries are extremely difficult to define, and relevant judicial precedents are still in the formative stage globally.62% similarUnverifiedThis is the first publicly blocked foreign acquisition case in the AI sector since China's Measures for the Security Review of Foreign Investments came into effect in 2020.61% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Copyright Office's 2023 report "Artificial Intelligence and Copyright" states that purely AI-generated content does not qualify for copyright protection (establishing precedent in Thaler v. Vidal).61% similarUnverifiedJapan's Supreme Court has ruled that AI cannot be named as a patent inventor.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/546097API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/546097MCP
get_claim(id=546097)