Unverified60% confidenceSolutionExact time
AI should be assigned mechanical, verifiable, low-creativity work, while core thinking, judgment, and innovation are left to the researchers themselves.
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/14/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Claims
VerifiedFor practitioners following AI development, rather than judging whether a capability is possible or not, it is better to dynamically track technological progress and periodically recalibrate one's cognitive model.80% similarUnverifiedAI scientific research tools excel at handling repetitive and mechanical work, but true scientific innovation still relies on the professional judgment of researchers.80% similarVerifiedThe way to resolve the ambiguity of creative tasks is to feed the AI enough high-quality examples so that it can evaluate and iteratively improve its output accordingly.79% similarVerifiedAI是效率放大器，不是专业能力的替代品，智能体系统的架构设计仍需扎实技术功底79% similarVerifiedAI can help researchers efficiently execute plans, but cannot determine which research direction is truly valuable79% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/746651API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/746651MCP
get_claim(id=746651)