Unverified60% confidenceFactExact time
The MIT license is fully friendly to commercial use; companies can build closed-source products based on the code, with the only requirement being to retain the original copyright notice
2
Sources
60%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
8/28/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe MIT License permits closed-source commercial use, with the only requirement being that copyright and license notices be included in all copies; unlike the GPL license, it has no copyleft effect.73% similarVerifiedMIT License是最宽松的开源许可协议，几乎可以随意使用，只需保留版权声明73% similarUnverifiedidempotent-tools adopts the MIT license, introduces no third-party dependencies in its default backend, and can be freely used in commercial projects.66% similarVerifiedThe Apache 2.0 license, unlike the GPL family, allows users to integrate code into closed-source commercial products and includes explicit patent grant clauses, whereas the MIT license does not include an explicit grant of patent rights.65% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/813573API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/813573MCP
get_claim(id=813573)