Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time

该用户表示Grok 4.6消耗额度比Grok 4.5快得多

1

Sources

50%

Confidence

Short-term (~14 days)

Relevance

8/30/2026

First Seen

Valid until: 9/13/2026

Sources

Cursor模型自动切换引争议：用户手动选择为何被无视？

Related Entities

Grok 4.6model Grok 4.5model

Related Claims

UnverifiedGrok 4.6的智能指数比Grok 4.5高5分，比Grok 4.3高23分79% similar Unverified根据官方在 WANDR 基准测试上的数据，Grok 4.6 位于性能与效率的帕累托前沿74% similar UnverifiedGrok 4.5在SWE Bench Pro任务上的输出Token比Opus 4.8少4.2倍73% similar Unverified据称 Grok 4.5 的 token 效率约为同类领先模型的两倍，能用不到一半的步骤完成任务70% similar

Cite This Claim

Stable URI

https://kongchang.com/claim/824317

API

curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/824317

MCP

get_claim(id=824317)