Unverified90% confidenceFactTime unknown
2011年美国最高法院在AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion案中以5比4裁定各州不得以'不公平'为由拒绝执行仲裁协议中的集体诉讼豁免条款
1
Sources
90%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
5/31/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified在美国民事诉讼中，拒绝配合或隐瞒证据可能构成妨碍司法（Spoliation of Evidence），法庭有权实施制裁，包括不利推定指示或直接判定不利裁决64% similarUnverifiedIn 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Van Buren v. United States that merely accessing information one is authorized to access but for an improper purpose does not constitute a violation of the CFAA.63% similarUnverified强制仲裁条款要求用户在发生纠纷时必须通过私人仲裁而非公开法庭解决争议，且禁止集体诉讼62% similarUnverified美国联邦法院对提交虚假引用律师的制裁法律依据主要源自《联邦民事诉讼规则》第11条（Rule 11）61% similarUnverifiedThe 2022 Supreme Court ruling in Van Buren v. United States narrowed the scope of applicability of the CFAA.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/8260API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/8260MCP
get_claim(id=8260)