Unverified50% confidenceTradeoffExact time
Tool security design involves trade-offs: rule-matching-based approaches offer centralized management but may be brittle, while defining risk levels at the decorator level has clear semantics but is coupled to business code.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/9/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedSkills Store的审核机制包括检查是否存在提示词注入风险或数据泄露隐患70% similarUnverified工具调用可按影响程度划分为三个风险等级：只读/无副作用操作（低风险）可自动执行、可逆写操作（中风险）可事后通知或批量确认、不可逆/高影响操作（高风险）必须触发人类审批70% similarUnverifiedThe Preparedness Framework divides risk categories into four core domains: cybersecurity, chemical/biological/nuclear/radiological weapons (CBRN), model autonomy, and persuasion and deception70% similarUnverified风险分级应引入'默认最高风险'（Fail-Safe Default）原则，对无法匹配任何规则的未知工具自动归入高风险类别触发人工审批70% similarUnverified高质量监管风险报告采用三层递进结构：风险点精准描述、适用性论证、可执行的落地举措69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/884898API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/884898MCP
get_claim(id=884898)