Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
The limitation of the hiQ ruling is that it only constrains the U.S. Ninth Circuit jurisdiction; if a platform requires login, CFAA risks re-emerge, and platforms can still assert rights under copyright law or contract law.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/12/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe hiQ v. LinkedIn ruling only applies within the U.S. Ninth Circuit and is still subject to the threat of civil litigation under platform terms of service.74% similarUnverifiedThe ruling in hiQ v. LinkedIn does not exempt civil liability for violating platform terms of service, nor does it address independent compliance obligations under the GDPR data minimization principle.64% similarVerified美国《数字千年版权法》(DMCA)第1201条对规避技术保护措施有明确限制61% similarUnverified违反无障碍访问规范在部分司法辖区（如美国ADA法案适用范围）可能面临法律风险60% similarVerifiedIn 2022, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in hiQ Labs v. LinkedIn that scraping publicly available data does not violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.60% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/915567API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/915567MCP
get_claim(id=915567)