Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The paper's authors argue that the essence of governance failure is organizational and architectural rather than technical.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified对于关系民生的关键系统，韧性应优先于效率，应采用'为失败而设计'的哲学，假设系统终将出错并确保影响可控62% similarUnverifiedOrganizational behavior scholar Jo Freeman pointed out in 'The Tyranny of Structurelessness' that when formal power structures are abolished, informal and opaque power structures tend to fill the vacuum and are even harder to hold accountable.60% similarUnverified史蒂夫·布兰克提出「客户开发」方法论，认为初创公司失败的首要原因不是技术问题，而是在没有客户的情况下执行商业计划59% similarUnverifiedFrontier model governance faces a dilemma: overly heavy regulation may stifle innovation and entrench the advantages of giants, while laissez-faire may plant hidden risks in areas of safety, misuse, and alignment.59% similarUnverified麦肯锡研究表明，数字化转型项目中超过70%的失败案例可归因于组织和文化阻力，而非技术障碍59% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/921744API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/921744MCP
get_claim(id=921744)