Unverified50% confidenceOpinionExact time
In high-stakes scenarios such as legal document verification and medical evidence review, the cost of missing one critical counter-evidence is far greater than the cost of reading redundant documents.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/15/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedOutdated documentation is more dangerous than no documentation, because it misleads those who come after.70% similarUnverifiedPassing brief summaries is low-cost but may erase critical evidence and quietly turn inferences into facts, preventing downstream agents from determining whether information represents an explicit decision or a model guess.70% similarUnverified坎贝尔·哈维等学者的研究表明，金融学术文献中大量被发表的因子可能都是回测过拟合或数据窥探偏差的结果68% similarUnverifiedIn secret scanning scenarios, both false positives and false negatives carry extremely high costs: false negatives may lead to data breaches, while false positives overwhelm security teams with large volumes of invalid alerts67% similarUnverifiedThe F2 score is used instead of F1 in literature screening scenarios because the cost of missing a relevant paper is far greater than the cost of including an irrelevant one.67% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/922257API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/922257MCP
get_claim(id=922257)