Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
The official release information for Code Scans is relatively brief, and details such as accuracy during the evaluation phase, performance on large and complex codebases, PR quality consistency, and security and privacy mechanisms for private codebases remain unclear.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/16/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 9/30/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedCode Scans is well-suited for handling cross-cutting tasks such as technical debt cleanup, code style unification, and large-scale refactoring—tasks with broad scope, low per-point value but high aggregate value.71% similarUnverifiedCommon merge gates include unit test pass rates, code coverage thresholds, static analysis with no errors, and security vulnerability scanning, and they are deeply integrated with platforms such as GitHub Actions and GitLab CI.70% similarUnverified安全检测层往往在代码进入沙箱执行之前就基于代码外表而非实际危害进行分析，导致误报70% similarUnverified代码审查场景公开数据集丰富、评判标准明确，比医疗分诊和招聘筛选更适合本科毕设69% similarUnverifiedA 2013 Microsoft Research paper, 'Expectations, Outcomes, and Challenges of Modern Code Review,' points out that the core value of code review lies not only in bug discovery but also in knowledge sharing and the implicit alignment of coding standards.69% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/927743API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/927743MCP
get_claim(id=927743)