Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
An appeals court ruling rejecting expansive copyright claims does not directly determine whether AI training is lawful
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/17/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe UK Supreme Court rejected the request to list an AI as an inventor.68% similarUnverifiedThe U.S. Copyright Office's 2023 AI copyright guidelines have not yet clearly defined the copyright ownership of model outputs used as training data.67% similarUnverifiedIf courts rule that AI training constitutes copyright infringement, legitimate activities such as search engine web indexing and caching, text mining, and large-scale data analysis in academic research could all be implicated67% similarUnverified美国版权法第107条允许在评论、教育、研究等场景下未经授权使用受版权保护的作品（合理使用原则），但商业性AI训练是否属于变革性使用仍存在争议67% similarUnverifiedAI training data is often used without explicit authorization from the original authors, which is the core source of copyright disputes.66% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/929948API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/929948MCP
get_claim(id=929948)