Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
arXiv endorsement eligibility is determined using a point-based logic, where the system counts the number of an author's submissions in a specific category within a specific time window (typically the past five years) and automatically grants endorsement eligibility for that category upon reaching the threshold.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/21/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedPriority recognition for technical discoveries depends on verifiable public timestamps (such as arXiv submission dates and code commit records), but priority is not equivalent to attribution of influence, and a Matthew effect exists in AI information dissemination.70% similarVerifiedACL ARR review results can be reused within a certain cycle; authors may choose to commit to a conference or Findings, or withdraw and re-enter with existing reviews in a subsequent cycle.63% similarUnverifiedExperienced users believe that ARR results are always released with a delay of at least half a day.61% similarUnverified有自动化经验者看日志一句话即可解决问题，无经验者依赖AI反复排查处理时间是有经验者的3到5倍61% similarUnverifiedIn ARR's rolling review model, researchers can submit papers at any time and the system assigns reviewers on a monthly basis rather than being constrained by a single conference deadline61% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/937946API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/937946MCP
get_claim(id=937946)