Expired50% confidenceFactExact time
The 17.25% figure lacks a complete description of its statistical scope, data sources, and verification methodology.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/21/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/5/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedThe author believes the 17.25% figure should be treated as a signal worth tracking, rather than an established fact.68% similarUnverifiedIf there is a distributional gap between the evaluation data and production data, the evaluation score cannot reflect the model's true performance67% similarUnverified研究表明即使是轻微的数据污染也可能导致评测分数虚高5-15个百分点65% similarUnverifiedA study found that approximately one-third of the data sources cited by Perplexity do not actually contain the number it claims.64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/938256API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/938256MCP
get_claim(id=938256)