Expired50% confidenceOpinionExact time
The author believes the 17.25% figure should be treated as a signal worth tracking, rather than an established fact.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Short-term (~14 days)
Relevance
9/21/2026
First Seen
Valid until: 10/5/2026(expired)
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
Unverified25%的风险降幅数字仍需在方法论严格的复制研究中验证，应被视为值得进一步验证的信号而非最终定论69% similarUnverifiedThe 17.25% figure lacks a complete description of its statistical scope, data sources, and verification methodology.68% similarUnverified研究表明人类评估者在判断LLM输出的事实准确性时，正确率往往只有50%-70%65% similarUnverifiedSingle-period data, lack of horizontal comparison, and differences in reporting standards mean that the 51% zero-payout data should be treated as a signal worth further investigation rather than a definitive judgment of the company.65% similarUnverifiedPrecision bias refers to the tendency for people to assign higher credibility to statements containing precise numbers; experiments show that subjects rated the credibility of "41.3%" significantly higher than "approximately 40%".64% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/938264API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/938264MCP
get_claim(id=938264)