Unverified50% confidenceFactExact time
ICLR requires reviewers not to actively search for papers to confirm author identity, placing part of the double-blind responsibility on the reviewer side.
1
Sources
50%
Confidence
Long-term
Relevance
9/22/2026
First Seen
Sources
Related Entities
Related Claims
UnverifiedICLR review rules generally prohibit authors from revealing their identity in the body of the paper, such as using phrasing like 'as shown in our previous work on arXiv'.76% similarUnverifiedICLR's reviewing policy stipulates that if a person's name appears on 3 or more submitted papers, they must take on reviewing duties.66% similarUnverifiedThe use of AI does not exempt professionals from their verification obligations, and attorneys, as signatories of legal documents, are obligated to ensure the accuracy of submitted content.63% similarUnverifiedThe Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) has explicitly stated that AI cannot be listed as an author of a paper because it cannot bear responsibility for the research content.61% similarUnverifiedThe NO FAKES Act advancing in the U.S. Congress requires explicit written authorization from the individual before AI-generated realistic simulations of that person can be created, and the authorization cannot be given by a third party on their behalf.57% similar
Cite This Claim
Stable URI
https://kongchang.com/claim/940367API
curl https://kongchang.com/api/v1/knowledge/claims/940367MCP
get_claim(id=940367)